Skip to content

Case Studies

A promising market is an important part of an international expansion decision, but it is only one piece of the equation. Companies also need to know whether their business model can actually work under local conditions.

Local conditions can determine whether an international expansion succeeds or fails. Buying habits may vary, distribution channels may operate in unfamiliar ways, regulations can change the economics of the business, and success may depend on relationships with local suppliers, distributors, government officials, and other stakeholders. A model that has performed exceptionally well in one country may need significant changes before it can work in another.

These six companies entered promising international markets with very different results. Their experiences show some of the questions companies should be asking before they commit significant resources to expansion.

Explore the six cases
Pacific surf along a volcanic Hawaiʻi coastline

Global opportunity.
Local understanding.

Target in Canada

Moving too fast in a market that looked familiar

All six cases ↑

Canada appeared to be a natural first international market for Target. It was geographically close, Canadian consumers already knew the brand, and many Canadians regularly crossed the border to shop at Target stores in the United States. Target entered Canada in 2013 and expanded rapidly. By the time it announced its withdrawal less than two years later, it had 133 stores across the country.

The problems surfaced quickly - stores struggled with inventory, popular items were frequently unavailable, and Target acknowledged that its Canadian pricing was not as competitive as it needed to be. For customers who already knew the U.S. stores, the Canadian experience fell short of expectations.

Target CEO, Brian Cornell, later acknowledged that the company had taken on too much too fast. The company ultimately concluded that it could not identify a realistic path to profitability in Canada before 2021. Target withdrew from the market in 2015 and recorded more than $5 billion in pre-tax losses associated with its discontinued Canadian operations.

KFC in China

Localizing the business went well beyond changing the menu

All six cases ↑

KFC entered China in 1987 and has since developed one of the country's largest restaurant networks. By the end of 2025, KFC operated 12,997 restaurants in more than 2,500 Chinese cities.

Its expansion provides an example of localization that reached into many parts of the business.

KFC hired leaders with experience navigating both Chinese and Western business environments. It developed close relationships with government and other local stakeholders. When existing distribution infrastructure could not support the scale it wanted to achieve, the company developed its own distribution capabilities and worked with Chinese suppliers to strengthen quality and capacity.

The food changed too. KFC's Chinese menu grew to include rice dishes, congee, vegetables, seafood, tea, and other products tailored to local preferences. Many of those offerings bear little resemblance to what a customer would expect in an American KFC.

None of those changes required KFC to give up the brand people recognized. The company adapted the parts of the business that needed to work differently in China while retaining the elements that gave the brand its value.

Home Depot in China

A proven business model met customers who approached home improvement differently

All six cases ↑

When Home Depot entered China in 2006, the opportunity looked substantial. China was experiencing rapid urbanization, home ownership was increasing, and the home improvement market was growing.

Home Depot acquired 12 stores from the Chinese retailer Home Way, giving the company an immediate presence in six cities.

Its traditional big-box business, however, had been developed in a market where many homeowners bought tools and supplies and completed improvement projects themselves.

Home Depot's China experience found that many Chinese consumers approached home renovation differently. Labor was relatively inexpensive and customers were more accustomed to hiring people to complete renovation work for them. Home Depot itself eventually described China as more of a do-it-for-me market.

That difference affected much more than advertising. A retailer serving customers who want to complete their own projects needs a different mix of products, services, expertise, store formats, and customer support than one serving customers who expect someone else to manage the work.

In 2012, Home Depot closed its seven remaining big-box stores in China and recorded an after-tax charge of approximately $160 million. The company shifted its focus toward specialty stores and online channels that it believed were better suited to Chinese customers.

IKEA in India

Years of research shaped how IKEA entered the market

All six cases ↑

India offered IKEA an attractive long-term opportunity. Its population, urban growth, and expanding consumer market supported the business case for entering the country. But IKEA still took years to prepare its India entry.

Before opening its first Indian store, the company conducted around 500 home visits to understand how people actually lived. IKEA employees looked at household layouts, storage, humidity, cleaning practices, and how furniture and other products were used. The research helped the company identify conditions that would affect its products and home furnishing solutions in India.

IKEA also had to work through India's regulatory requirements, develop relationships with suppliers and government officials, and consider how its pricing and service model would work for Indian consumers.

Its first Indian store opened in Hyderabad in August 2018 and the company has continued to adjust its approach as it expands. In 2026, IKEA announced plans to invest more than $2.2 billion in India over five years, with plans to expand its retail presence and increase local sourcing. It is also entering some new Indian cities online before opening physical stores, allowing the company to develop its customer base before making larger brick-and-mortar investments.

M-Pesa in South Africa

Success elsewhere in Africa did not translate automatically to another African market

All six cases ↑

M-Pesa became one of the world's best-known mobile money success stories after taking off in Kenya and expanding into other countries.

South Africa seemed to offer another large market for the service. Vodacom launched M-Pesa there expecting that mobile financial services could address a need similar to the one the platform had met elsewhere, but the service struggled to gain enough users. Vodacom discontinued M-Pesa in South Africa in 2016.

When explaining the decision, Vodacom pointed specifically to South Africa's high level of financial inclusion. M-Pesa needed a critical mass of users to become sustainable, and the company concluded that the South African market was unlikely to provide that scale under the existing model. M-Pesa continued growing in countries where access to traditional financial services was more limited.

This distinction matters because, from a distance, Kenya and South Africa could both fit into an African growth strategy for mobile financial services. But the conditions affecting customer demand were substantially different. South Africans had greater access to traditional banking and other financial services. That changed the problem M-Pesa was trying to solve and, in turn, the value of the service to potential customers.

Starbucks in Japan

A strong local partner helped Starbucks adapt its model without losing what made the brand distinctive

All six cases ↑

Japan was Starbucks' first international market outside North America. Rather than entering alone, Starbucks formed a joint venture with Japanese retailer and restaurant operator Sazaby in 1995. The first store opened in Tokyo's Ginza district in 1996.

The partnership gave Starbucks access to local knowledge as it introduced a relatively new coffeehouse concept to Japanese consumers. Some of the changes were small yet revealing. For example, at Sazaby's recommendation, baked goods were made less sweet than those sold in the United States, and decaffeinated coffee was left off the original menu because there was little demand for it in Japan. At the same time, Starbucks kept much of the experience that distinguished the brand in the United States, including its coffee, store atmosphere, employee training, and emphasis on the café as a place to spend time.

The partnership continued for nearly two decades. When Starbucks moved to acquire full ownership of the Japanese business in 2014, the company specifically credited Sazaby's operational leadership with helping establish and grow the business. By that point, Starbucks Japan had more than 1,000 stores and was one of the company's strongest international markets. And the growth has continued. Thirty years after entering Japan, Starbucks has more than 2,100 stores across all 47 prefectures.

What These Cases Show

These companies faced very different markets and business challenges. Target's Canadian expansion exposed weaknesses in execution and the pace of its rollout. Home Depot learned that a central assumption behind its retail model did not fit the way many Chinese consumers approached home improvement. M-Pesa encountered a South African financial market where customers already had access to alternatives that were less available in some of its strongest markets. Whereas KFC adapted multiple parts of its business to operate successfully in China. IKEA invested heavily in understanding Indian consumers and built its presence over time. Starbucks worked with a local partner to adapt its model in Japan while preserving its distinctive brand experience. Taken together, the cases raise several questions worth answering before a company makes a significant international investment.

  1. 01

    How do customers actually buy, use, and evaluate what we sell?

  2. 02

    Which assumptions behind our existing business model depend on conditions in our home market?

  3. 03

    How will local regulations affect costs, operations, and growth?

  4. 04

    Can local suppliers and distribution channels support our strategy?

  5. 05

    Which government, business, and community stakeholders will affect our ability to execute?

  6. 06

    Which parts of our model need to adapt?

  7. 07

    How much should we commit before we have tested our most important assumptions?

  8. 08

    Are our systems and people ready to execute the strategy locally?

The companies that answer these questions early are better positioned to make smarter investments, adapt before problems become expensive, and build an expansion strategy that can succeed on the ground.

Market opportunity is only the starting point. Before committing significant capital, companies need to understand how their strategy will actually work under local conditions, where friction is likely to emerge, and what may need to change.

The best time to find the gaps in an expansion strategy is before the market finds them for you.

Discuss your expansion